"The 2016 presidential election"
When Mr. Obama entered the race for the White House I said to my wife "This is going to be trouble," Looking back now I wonder what made me say that to her with such assurance, I'm not a prophet, I knew very little about Mr. Barak Hussein Obama, maybe a little more about the people he associated with.
Also, it seemed to me that there was a similar atmosphere to the late nineteen thirties with unrest in Western Europe.
So what is it that has created such an obvious decline in the country's Economy, Employment and Moral status?
- approving bills before reading /analyzing them
- Increasing taxes (Obama care) is a tax
- reduction of the military strength
- losses of substantial jobs/employment
- breakdown of the family unit
- people's dependency on Government Assistance
- creation of an Entitlement society
- creation and fuelling of Civil Unrest/Civil Disobedience
- President's ignoring the Constitution of the USA
The present Democrat Administration of Obama has had it's problems dealing with the truth and there are still so many unresolved painful scandals causing convenient smokescreens for the likes of Eric Holder, Hilary Clinton and Barak Obama himself.
Well hey, Obama was a good community Organizer, the first ever to win a Nobel Peace prize for that type of work in Chicago. FYI it was don Vito Corleone award for a special type of peacekeeping in Chicago Illinois.
Of course the GOP is not without its own troubles with too many contenders crowding the field of 'wannabes' and the likes of Donald Trump who is so proud of his dubious record as 'Business man' and counts his obnoxious behaviour as a Plus.
Free enterprise, 'Business' is always a gamble and when a business fails there are many reasons why just ask Carly Fiorina or Donald Trump they will quickly point to all the people and reasons why their businesses failed.
Of course the mainstream media is totally neutral in their Journalistic exploits, blinded by the popularity that they hope will be theirs, reporting is done totally unbiased (could you spell that last word again?) and following the dictates of the left. .....
..... So much so, that a group of so-called experts, professional journalists, can not even lead and moderate a debate without losing the respect of the general public and some media.
"RNC Leaders Who Allowed CNBC to Moderate Debate Should Be Condemned (10.28.15)" "After 15 minutes it was clear that this was not a debate, but a verbal shooting gallery set up by CNBC, with the targets, the Republican candidates and the shooters their biased antagonists from the press,” said Meese. “Ted Cruz accurately described what was going on,” he said. “Whoever selected the ‘moderators’ should be fired and the RNC leaders who allowed it should be condemned.”
To be fair to the CNBC crew 'Debate' is a big word and Daniel Webster shows it after another big word 'Debase' so you can see that in all fairness the CNBC crew should not be blamed for being so inept when after all they were just following the "Rules" of the game.
There are always 'Winners and Losers" and Wednesday's losers were obviously the handpicked team of despicable press members, the moderators. The winners, the GOP wannabes defended each other against the moderators and clearly scored high but they also were losers,
Losers because the purpose of a Political Debate is to get equal exposure for all the contestants which clearly is not in the CNBC or CNN rulebook. In a political debate all parties must be addressed and treated equally, 'Unbiased' is an other big word that the CNBC team seems to have trouble with.
I hope that before there is an other "Public Debate" that there will be an upgrade schooling session for 'media hopefuls.'